All religions of Earth to this point have been false. On February 18, 2010, my body dissolved out of thin air and I suddenly appeared in a dark void where The Creator telepathically "spoke" to me. The Creator told me that all of the Universes events were set in motion by its command. The Creator is the architect of the natural forces, but the Universe is left to operate on its own due to those forces. The Creator told me that other species in the Universe have been notified of its presence once one individual has reached a certain level of awareness. This level of awareness triggers that individual to be transported to The Creator, and this transportation mechanism was built into the Universe since the beginning. The Creator told me that there is an inherent will towards harmonious survival built into all the Universes creations. A species that has reached a level of awareness to destroy itself threatens this Harmony; it is a flaw introduced in the Universe. Thus, The Creator must reveal itself to that species in order to restore Harmony. This mechanism was created at the creation of the Universe. I am the first to reach this awareness level among our species. I was told that others will follow me to reach this level of awareness and speak with The Creator, given that they follow my guidance. You must abolish all religious beliefs and governments in order to do that which promotes Harmony. There are no mandates concerning how each person should promote Harmony: each individual shall determine this for his/herself. Our Earth is not guaranteed to be perfect, but it will approach Harmony in the coming years. In the coming years, I shall promote knowledge of Harmony through various media, including grand public speeches in front of audiences and televised throughout Earth. Since I have been the first to reach the level of awareness required to speak to The Creator, the laws of the Universe require that I rule and safe-guard Earth from falling out of Harmony. It is my duty to benevolently lead all of Earths people and amass great wealth in order to effectively promote Harmony. I need promises now that you will promote my pre-destined rise to the position of Earths leader and help me amass the wealth required to fulfill my duties as leader. Let go of your governments laws as well as rebel against your religions. All religions were simply man-made creations that have been misconstrued as truth over the thousands of years. This is truth.
Answer: Finally a religion that makes sense All hail Ubi.
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-20
If I want to be an architect but go to engineering school, what type of engineering is best to study?
Answer: Civil engineering....best deal to fulfill your dreams...it supports you in field of structure analysis n also in designing...it gives basic knowledge of engineering designs...useful for architecture also...but remember,when u go for Civil u must have elective subjects in last year or semester ,which leads u to go for a particular subject...like environment,infrastructure,geology of earth...etc....
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-20
After watching what architects and engineers say about 9-11, do you still believe planes fell the towers?
Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid-4617650616903609314 The National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST and Popular Mechanics have examined and rejected the theory. But that just creates a he-said she-said scenario in this situation. It seems like more than planes caused the towers to collapse, b/c it was obliterated right down to the lobby. I can see it possibly in a worse case scenario, getting weak, falling onto itself, wrecking the next 30- or so floors, and then tipping to the side and falling off. But that little top piece was far less weight than what was below it, yet it piled through the entire thing, as if all the floors below it suddenly were supported by matchsticks... right down to the lobby. Usually our first impressions are the right ones.. and when i saw it collapse, my thoughts were controlled demoliton although i cant prove it. Youll find many more folks who said thats what their first thought was too. Especially the wt7 building that was also brought down in a perfect case closed controlled demolition manner, with people on-site saying before hand: stay back theyre bringing it down Im more inclined to believe what architects and engineers are saying, rather than NIST and PM are saying, but still its a he-said she-said scenario.. and hopefully someday the truth will be known. why do so many people refuse to peer into the painful issues, but instead turn and run away from them like sissies? architects and engineers are NOT conspiracy theorists, they are presenting the truths and evidence of what happened on 9-22 9-11 i mean write me off all you like arcade, i could actually care less, but dont expect me to do the same, im not heartless
Answer: The CIA was following the terrorists, but let them go into the US without telling the FBI. The CIA then, after 9/11 asked for the power to spy on American soil, which isnt part of their charter. Instead of doing its job, the CIA was rewarded for failure.
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-19
After seeing what architects and engineers are saying about 9-11, do you still believe planes fell the towers?
Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid-4617650616903609314 The National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST and Popular Mechanics have examined and rejected the theory. But that just creates a he-said she-said scenario in this situation. It seems like more than planes caused the towers to collapse, b/c it was obliterated right down to the lobby. I can see it possibly in a worse case scenario, getting weak, falling onto itself, wrecking the next 30- or so floors, and then tipping to the side and falling off. But that little top piece was far less weight than what was below it, yet it piled through the entire thing, as if all the floors below it suddenly were supported by matchsticks... right down to the lobby. Usually our first impressions are the right ones.. and when i saw it collapse, my thoughts were controlled demoliton although i cant prove it. Youll find many more folks who said thats what their first thought was too. Especially the wt7 building that was also brought down in a perfect case closed controlled demolition manner, with people on-site saying before hand: stay back theyre bringing it down Im more inclined to believe what architects and engineers are saying, rather than NIST and PM are saying, but still its a he-said she-said scenario.. and hopefully someday the truth will be known.
Answer: The R&S section is perfect for this, because conspiracy theories border on "cult" status.
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-18
What subjects should I choose? I want to be an architect.?
I am in year 9 and currently in the process of choosing my year 10 subjects. When I finish school, and hopefully university I want to be an architect. I have had my mind set on the idea since I was 9 years old. I have four spaces to take up. I am 100% doing Art Design and I am not sure if I should do P.E. I really need your advice, I need to decide between Multimedia, and Information Publishing and Processing. I discussed it with a teacher. She said both would cover skills that would be useful. I am still not sure. Her advice was to go for the one that feels right, and the one I feel I will enjoy the most. I need to decide soon or spots in classes will be taken up. You are probably wondering why someone who wishes to be an architect would be doing P.E. Well this is because I really enjoy doing. Should I follow the advice of the teacher, and do the ones I will enjoy or drop P.E. , and do both multimedia and information publishing and processing. Please help, I am trying to plan my future so I will be happy.
Answer: Well you enjoy PE too so just leave it. And take multimedia I guess. Can you also take the other one next year?
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-18
Do you seriously believe the towers wouldnt of collapsed, nevermind in under 10 secs. If Boeing 707s hit them?
Architect Minoru Yamasaki designed the World Trade Center towers to withstand a collision with a Boeing 707 airplane Federal Emergency Management Agency 2002. The Boeing 707 is similar to the Boeing 767s that actually crashed into the towers, the main differences being that the 767 is slightly heavier and slower. http://www.science-writing.org/id29.html Photo: Boeing 707 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Boeing_707_Air_India_Basle_-_1976.jpg Photo Boeing 767 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Delta_Air_Lines_B767-300ER_N1607B.JPG
Answer: It seems like more than planes caused the towers to collapse, b/c it was obliterated right down to the lobby. I can see it possibly in a worse case scenario, getting weak, falling onto itself, wrecking the next 30- or so floors, and then tipping to the side and falling off.. if that would have happened.. no question Planes and Islamic terrorists but that little top piece was far less weight than what was below it, yet it piled through the entire thing, as if all the floors below it suddenly were supported by matchsticks... right down to the lobby. usually our first impressions are the right ones.. and when i saw it collapse, my thoughts were controlled demoliton although i cant prove it. Youll find many more folks who said thats what their first thought was too. Especially the wt7 building that was also brought down in a perfect case closed controlled demolition manner, with people on-site saying before hand: stay back theyre bringing it down
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-18
After hearing what architects and engineers are saying, how can you agree planes and gravity alone caused 911?
namely caused the two towers to fall.. and also another tower that was not hit by any planes, which seemed to be brought down in a very controlled demolishment like manner? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid-4617650616903609314
Answer: Hi, Q: World Trade centres were what? A: Financial centres. so was the other building that went down in sympathy with the twin towers. Q: What has the world experienced recently? A: a severe financial crisis. So what were the obvious controlled explosions demolition for? To cover up the trail that if followed would out those responsible for the towers atrocities and put an end to the massive hoax where multiple countries banking systems would be shored up by taxpayers money. So they decided to get rid of the evidence the paper trail that would spill the beans, then the evidence of the use of Thermite on the towers was casually removed ALL the remains of the steel beams were taken and dumped at sea [NO forensic testing was allowed, NO crime scene investigations or procedure allowed, NO photographs of the incriminating evidence etc.] I find it unbelievable, because IT IS Unbelievable and if you think such a thought is impossible to even run with, that nobody would kill all those innocent people, then think again, how many times have you heard of a person killing another person because they wanted the tenner that the person they killed was carrying or some other ridiculous amount, now apply that rationale to a group who have plotted for years and have a Multi-Billion world-wide payoff in sight, What might they do to keep it on track? No, Hush, hush little children, go back to sleep, it was only a bad dream, We will take care of you... Good Luck.
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-17
Photography or VisCom?
So I am in grade twelve right now and am about to make a decision on what career path I want to take. I believe that I am going to become an Architect. However, in order to enter the course, I have to earn a bachelors degree in something. My idea is to go to ACAD Alberta College of Art and Design and get my bachelor of design. The only problem is that there are two paths I can take in order to get this degree. I can go with photography or graphic design. Both are the same price and length and difficulty so its not a deciding factor here. My issue is that I love them both and would like to pursue them, but I cant choose which one. My biggest thought is if I cant find any work as an architect I need a career to fall back on. Both are high risk/high reward careers so... I dont know. I hope this made sense about what I am asking lol. Please give any advice you can for me thank you so much
Answer: Hi, I think Photography is a one the part in VisCom. So you Join VisCom. Check this link http://www.emagister.in/visual_communication_courses-tps557522.htm. Its include some VisCom offered colleges. Viscom Visual communication is the communication of ideas through the visual display of information. Primarily associated with two dimensional images, it includes: alphanumerics, art, signs, and electronic resources. Recent research in the field has focused on web design and graphically oriented usability. It involves our eyes, heart, and mind. . By the time we reach adulthood, we have millions of visual images stored in the dark recesses of our minds. Our memories serve us and ground us. Our minds reminiscence and recall visual messages during our waking and sleeping hours; which in turn, visual imagery form our thinking, attitudes, and personalities. Photography 1.The art or process of producing images of objects on photosensitive surfaces. 2.The art, practice, or occupation of taking and printing photographs. 3.A body of photographs.
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-17
Who is your favorite Percy Jackson character?
I love all the characters Especially the Demigods Here are some of my faves. Annabeth. she is brave and inspiring, its neat that she has goals, like being an architect. She is so cleaver and wise. Her mom is Athena, one of my favorite gods/goddesses Rachel, I like that she was really easy to talk to, that means she doesnt judge you. I love that she became the Oracle of Delphi at the end, that way Annabeth can be with Percy Bianca Di Angelo, I like that she gave up her life for everyone else, I also like that she became a huntress, even though her brother didnt want her too. That means she stands up for herself. Nico, I love that he loved his sister so much he wanted to bring her back and that he hated Percy. I mean, everyone loved percy exept Kronos/luke I imagined him like a cool kid, but sentimental too. Luke, I liked him because even though he was the bad guy, he was so clever in the first book. He did have a point with the gods not caring about him, If I was in that position, I would think the same. I also like how he became the hero after all and how much Annabeth meant to him. Percy, Ok, so I like Percy, but I liked some other characters more. I sometimes felt annoyed at how he didnt know stuff and how dumb he seemed sometimes. But I love that he can control water I also like how he told the story. Calypso, I felt so bad for her And she made Annabeth jealous witch is a way of showing she liked him My favorite goddess was Athena, but I like Artemis too My favorite god is Poseidon, and I liked Mr. D. But in real Greek mythology, Im not a big fan of Dionysus... My favorite titan was Atlas. Im Team Annabeth Are you Team Annabeth, Rachel, or Calypso? for Percy Im Team Percy Are you team Luke or Percy? for Annabeth Which was your favorite book? I loved all of them. The first is so cleaver and the second has so much going on, so its also cleaver. PERCY JACKSON AND THE OLYMPIANS ROCK I cant wait for The heroes of Olympus to come out October 12 2010 I kinda like that Rick Riordan didnt name it after Percy this time lol But Im a little annoyed that its two boys and one girl, that the main boy like the girl and the other is just there. But still I cant wait
Answer: My favorite character was DEFINITELY Thalia. I loved her sarcasm and she was a character full of depth and all that. I love Percys sarcastic humor. My favorite Titan was that lightening dude. Im Team Rachel. I HATE Annabeth for some reason. My favorite goddess was Artemis, because shes a very independent woman. My favorite god was probably Hermes. I felt so bad for him. : Im Team Percy. : The first book is named after Percy though The Lost Hero... Hope I helped
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-17
Why did atheists automatically assume these stats must be made up?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_yltApOkSn1Xx_Gg1a896eccqiHsy6IX;_ylv3?qid20100817095120AAhMtT5&show7profile-info-Yk1asOK4aa Someone posted this question about someone claiming that a poll of MENSA members shows they are over 50% Christian and less than 5% atheist. Atheist posters automatically reacted with scorn and derision, claiming the numbers must be made up by some Christian apologetic site. Turns out the numbers are true, and the poll was conducted by MENSA itself. Granted, the poll is 20 years old, but has anything happened in the last 20 years that you think would radically alter that figure? What is this obsession that atheists seem to have about painting all religious people as dimwitted? MENSA is an organization for people with exceptional intelligence, but what kind of intelligence? Yes, the vast majority of scientists are atheist or agnostic, but why the assumption that every member of MENSA has degrees in physics and biology? How do you know the members arent genius writers, or genius artists, or genius musicians, or genius architects? Isnt it reasonable to say that there are many forms of intelligence, and MENSA would likely more closely resemble the general population in terms of religion instead of the scientific population? Is atheism really more likely to result from greater intelligence, or greater education? Theyre not the same thing. What exactly is the foundation for the "If youre smart, you must be an atheist, and if youre religious you must be a mouth-breathing moron," claim? Does it have any basis in reality, or is it just something that atheists tell themselves to massage their egos? Its obnoxious. Im an atheist, by the way, I just dont buy the argument that religiosity ALWAYS means stupidity. I think its a delusion, but even brilliant people can hold erroneous beliefs. It doesnt make them dumb. @ Prodigal Dogstar - look at the answers. Sure, this is a generalization, but its not one that I think is out of line. In keeping with the general theme of the question, I constantly see atheists make the claim that intelligence correlates to atheism, and this seems to be a popularly held belief around here. I of course didnt mean ALL atheists, or I would have to include myself in there, wouldnt I? @ Blessed Cheesemaker - believe me, I feel your pain on that one, but shouldnt we STILL hold ourselves to the standards to check out the facts first before we jump to conclusions since thats one of the things that Christians do that constantly piss us off? @ Frail Child of Dust - youre welcome : @ IanCorrigible - of course thats perfectly reasonable to question the validity of shaky claims, but it was more generally a question about the intelligence bias. But yes, I agree with you.
Answer: I do agree with your sentiment regarding our egos, but twenty years is quite a long time for attitudes to shift within a population. Think of it this way, 50 years ago Blacks could not eat in some of the same diners as Whites in most of southern U.S. Today, they can pretty much eat where ever people accept money for providing food yes, there are still hold-outs, but the vast majority of the population has had a dramatic shift in attitude. Twenty years ago, Milli Vanilli was thought of as a great singing group, while today very few people admit they liked Milli Vanilli, even if they really did in those days. Same thing with atheism. A poll from 20 years ago could easily have been skewed by people who though really arent Christian, posed as Christian for the poll so as to either fit in with some colleagues or avoid being ostracized by those who make it a business to attack atheists such as politicians. Im not dismissing the numbers from 20 years ago, Im saying that they may be tainted. Yes, there are tons of intelligent theists of all flavors, including Christian, but with any poll you take you have to consider whether or not some aspect of the question requires people to admit something they have fear of admitting. Think of it this way, if there was a poll of how many gay or lesbian members there were in Ted Haggards church, do you think Ted would have identified himself as gay?
Category: Architects; Date: 2010-08-17
