Arts Business Finance Health Society Travel

United Health Group

  Reptiles and Amphibians  Livestock Health  Apitherapy
  Breathwork  Ear Candling  Fasting and Cleansing
  Holistic and Integrated Medicine  Iridology  Meditation
  Non-Toxic Living  Ozone Therapy  Reiki
  Urine Therapy  Counseling Services  Mental Grief, Loss
  Bodyart and Tattoo  Cosmetics



Why do gays lie about a 10% or 15% number?
It is so obvious that these numbers are manufactured lies. If you disagree with these numbers, quote source and information for your mental confusion. men in Australia are 1.6% gay and .9% bisexual women in Austrailia are .8% lesbian and 1.4% bisexual. 1-2% Kinsey Demographic sexual orioentation report 2003: The largest and most thorough survey in Australia to date was conducted by telephone interview with 19,307 respondents between the ages of 16 and 59 in 2001/2002. The study found that 97.4% of men identified as heterosexual, 1.6% as gay and 0.9% as bisexual. For women 97.7% identified as heterosexual, 0.8% as lesbian and 1.4% as bisexual. Nevertheless, 8.6% of men and 15.1% of women reported either feelings of attraction to the same gender or some sexual experience with the same gender. While no one has carried out a door-to-door census, we do have a fairly accurate estimate. Interestingly, these statistics came to light in an amicus curiae “friend of the court” brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26, 2003, in the Lawrence vs. Texas case commonly known as the Texas sodomy case. On page 16 of this legal brief, footnote 42 revealed that 31 homosexual and pro-homosexual groups admitted the following: The most widely accepted study of sexual practices in the United States is the National Health and Social Life Survey NHSLS. The NHSLS found that 2.8% of the male, and 1.4% of the female population identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual Laumann, et al., 1994. The study also found that only 0.9% of men and 0.4% of women reported having only same-sex partners since age 18—a figure that would represent a total of only 1.4 million Americans as homosexual based on the last census report, showing roughly 292 million people living in America. The resulting accurate figures demonstrate that significantly less than one percent of the American population claims to be homosexual. The NHSLS results are similar to a survey conducted by the Minnesota Adolescent Health Survey 1986 of public school students. The survey showed that only 0.6% of the boys and 0.2% of the girls identified themselves as “mostly or 100% homosexual.” Dougeebee, the information cited is from the Kinsey report, try reading it, it does not say that 10% of the population is gay. Kinsey report was also used in Australia. The Great Australian sex report is an adnoc report and even it says 3.3 % of males are gay. Please read what this says. "The most widely accepted study" The most widely accepted study of sexual practices in the United States is the National Health and Social Life Survey NHSLS. The NHSLS found that 2.8% of the male, and 1.4% of the female population identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual Laumann, et al., 1994. That would mean 2% gay, but the lawrence report done by gays suggest continued .9% male and .4% female exclusive homosexuality since 18

Answer: No one is lying about the percentage, they are simply mistaken. The Kinsey research is out dated and not reliable, but many people do not realize this. Your figures are correct, but I think more people would realize this if you presented these facts in a more agreeable manner.
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-07-21

If you could teach President Obama one lesson, what would it be?
I would teach him the MLK lesson judge people by the content of their character. What would you teach him? Obama was elected the first black President "Hoping" he would "Change" the United States into a better place where people of all backgrounds, race, religion, income, wealth, age, health, BMI, sexual preference, education, and profession would be treated equally by the government. No more back room deals for straight white people, farmer, oil companies, minority groups, government employees, wall street bankers, auto unions, etc... He has done just the opposite. Obama is a divider not a uniter. Obama judges us all by our color, our income, our health and cuts backroom deals with everyone. Obamacare takes money from the healthy and gives it to the sick. If you are too old then forget it, you are too old for healthcare, youre not worth it. If Obama could learn the MLK lesson of judging people by the content of their character their actions and deeds and not their words, looks, income, job, etc. If Obama wasnt bigoted, and didnt discriminate he would have an Attorney General who prosecutes people based on their crimes and not their color or religion. In foreign policy he wouldnt judge Israel differently than Iran, Cuba, North Korea, and Venezuela. I would teach Obama to not discriminate based on anything else other than the content of a persons character. What would you teach him? If you disagree on what grounds? Why do you think discrimination based on anything other than character is acceptable? The I have a dream speech... Obama is no MLK http://www.youtube.com/watch?vLqS88XWt0hE&featureplayer_embedded tfloley50 can you elaborate? Not sure what you are saying about Beck. Also can you give an example about Obama what he should do or did do or didnt do that supports your comment. Lyssa, I cant figure out what you are saying. Do you have any examples. Im a conservative and I dont ever hear anyone I know say anything against Obama the person. Its all about his radical policies. You seem to live in a different world from me. Have you ever listened to conservative talk shows or watch Fox News? You should try it, its not anything like the propoganda you hear about. How_would good one. He just said the other day he was going to help business hire more people by making it easier for them to borrow money. Have you ever I mean ever heard of a company borrowing money to hire someone? You might be right balancing his check book would be a good start. RalphB, I believe you. You are correct Im a conservative meaning I believe in the constitution, natural law, limited federal government I am being totally sincere, but totally understand why you cant believe me. I think the only difference between me and you is you think you know what is being discussed on talk radio and Fox News where as I know what is being discussed and I know what is being discussed on mainsteem media too. Why dont you watch fox and listen to Mark Levin and Rush for one month. I will bet you $100 your opinion of me and the tea party movement will change. Do you wan to do it? Heres how the bet would work. You would honest write down what you believe about conservatives and the tea party movement. Then you would watch and listen to conservative points of view. Then you would write your new opinion of conservatives and the tea party. If your views have changed I win, if not you win. You up to it? James... Youre an idiot Go drink some more Obama koolaid. Ralph I think theres hope for you. You seem like a nice and reasonable guy. I guy I would enjoy and nice glass of Opus One with. Keep watching the real news and I think you will start to see more balance. The reason Fox doesnt get more democrats to interview is they refuse to come up because they will ask real questions. I used to watch OReilly but he now drives me nuts. I dont trust him he seems to change his views based on what he thinks will get him the best ratings with the "folks". Try Beck on Fox and Levine on the radio. Last thing, try not to see everything through a color lense. The guys you mentioned were not singled out because they were black, they were singled out because they were radicals. I noticed you didnt mention the white guy as education zcar, hes another radical but doesnt fit your colored glasses.

Answer: Id teach him something pretty basic.. like some simple checkbook balancing. Maybe thatd give him a basic understanding on economics..
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-07-28

Is this why Compassionate Conservative Christians Hate President Obama s Illegal Immigration Policy?
Wow, when I read this I was stunned - - - finally an answer to why Christians hate Obamas Policy Toward Illegal Immigration. Is this why Compassionate Conservative Christians hate Obamas Policies? http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/07/obama-has-deported-more-immigrants-than-bush/60433/ ""Even as the Obama administration fights Arizonas extreme immigration law, it deports more illegal immigrants than previous administrations with tougher platforms on the topic. The Washington Post reports: The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency expects to deport about 400,000 people this fiscal year, nearly 10 percent above the Bush administrations 2008 total and 25 percent more than were deported in 2007. The pace of company audits has roughly quadrupled since President George W. Bushs final year in office. But while previous administrations have relied on workplace raids, Obama has moved away from that tactic, instead auditing companies that hire illegals and assessing $6.4 million in fines. He has also tried to target immigrants with criminal backgrounds for deportation, skipping over those who are caring for children or the elderly: Nearly 50 percent of the people who have been deported from the United States this budget year have a criminal conviction, from driving without a license and DUI to major felonies, ICEs Morton said. That represents an increase of more than 36,000 over the same period in 2009, which showed a rise of 22,000 over 2008. "Occasionally, you will hear criticism that our criminal alien efforts are focused around people with cracked tailpipes and speeding tickets. Thats simply false," Morton said."" The same group that denounced Obama for wanting to give health care to the poor & disadvantaged, are they angry that Obama is not going after those caring for children & the elderly? Are Compassionate Conservative Christians the same group that denounces the unemployed as cry baby slackers angry because Obama is targeting potentially dangerous criminals instead of soft targets such as the elderly and children? Is this the real reason a compassionate Christian Conservative such as Jan Brewer is Angry at Obamas Policies, by not securing Americas borders against the poor, the elderly, and children? Are Compassionate Christian Conservatives angry because President Obamas administration is targeting the Companies that too often knowingly hire Illegal Immigrants? Gee, Granny, 10 % more than BUSH yea, know ya love Bush which works out to nearly 2,000 per day so that only leaves 10,000 unaccounted for. Gees, People thus Far - - - Not arguing wether Illegals ought to be in the US of A, I just wonder if people are angry becuase Obama is going after well to do companies & criminals rather than children & the elderly and so far I guess I am right. The other issue is that Obama thus far has done more than the Chaney/Bush Admin which no one seems to comprehend

Answer: What you may not understand is that regardless of what or who may be right or wrong does not make a difference because the main agenda of a lot of people is to make sure nothing the president does meets with their approval..
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-08-02

I would like to get opinions on the new 2011 tax increases?
Subject: 2011 is the largest TAX increase in history --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2011 TAX HIKES Read it and weep Notice they thought they could put it in after this November election: Past this on to likely voters. Small business are smart people, they are not hiring or expanding because they see lower or no profits, increased cost and a worsening economy. In just six months, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011: Biggest surprise to working Americans: Now your insurance is INCOME on your W2s...... One of the surprises well find come next year, is what follows - - a little "surprise" that 99% of us had no idea was included in the "new and improved" healthcare legislation Starting in 2011, next year folks, your W-2 tax form sent by your employer will be increased to show the value of whatever health insurance you are given by the company. You will now be required to pay taxes on a large sum of money that you have never seen. Take your tax form you just finished and see what $15,000 or $20,000 additional gross does to your Tax debt. Thats what youll pay next year. For many, it also puts you into a new higher bracket so its even worse. Here is an explanation of the rest. First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These tax cuts are all scheduled to expire on January 1, 2011: Personal income tax rates will rise. The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will be phased out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below: - The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15% - The 25% bracket rises to 28% - The 28% bracket rises to 31% - The 33% bracket rises to 36% - The 35% bracket rises to 39.6% Higher taxes on marriage and family. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut. The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate. Higher tax rates on RETIREES, Savers and Investors. The capital gains tax on investment income will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013. Second Wave: Obamacare There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include: The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account HSA, flexible spending account FSA, or health reimbursement HRA pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines except insulin. The “Special Needs Kids Tax” This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts FSAs of $2500 Currently, there is no federal government limit. There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Under tax rules, FSA dollars cannot be used to pay for this type of special needs education. The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent. Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011,they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—many AMT tax relief provisions will have expired. The major items include: The AMT will now apply to over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. These families will have to pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers. Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense rather than slowly-deduct, or depreciate” equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of the Darrell: I am not preaching to you. I am not saying something is fact. I am not posting this to inform anybody about anything.This information was forwarded to me and I posted it in hopes that the Yahoo community will help explain it to me. Im not a tax expert. I dont understand these taxes. I am hoping someone else does. Thats all. I come here for answers and opinions. Not to get involved in partisan bickering.

Answer: Please do not spam the board. As for this "news": The bush tax cuts were implemented as temporary. Temporary means they were automatically scheduled to rollback when they expired. They are now expiring. Just because people were used to the lower amounts does not make this wrong. Yes, its an increase from 2010 to 2011, but thats only if you have a 1 year mindset. HSA changes. HSA/FSA/HRA should NEVER have allowed OTC items. This definition lead to massive amounts of waste, greed and fraud. Before the cash register programs were updated, people were using their debit cards to buy Wiis. The FSA cap. Most companies used a cap because the money is non-refundable and they dont like being the bad guy when someone had too much withheld and didnt need to use the money. The people who maxed the accounts out were usually well off. Special Needs education can still be deducted on schedule A. Yes, the doubling of the 10% penalty for NOT using HSA money for medical expenses was mean, but since you can avoid the penalty by following the rules, it wont affect many people, even though it was passed as a way to raise money. If you are closing an account because of a low account balance, a 20% fee on $100 wont break the bank anyway--keeping the money in the account will be eaten up by fees anyway. The AMT. Yeah, never indexed by inflation. Every year, congress lets it default back to the 1978 amounts which means theoretically 28 million will pay it and then votes it back in in the Fall. It makes a mess for tax planning and helps Congress "balance" the budget they can spend more until its patched. This is NOT new. Special or bonus depreciation your article cant seem to call it by the right name. Oh, how sad another TEMPORARY law that lapsed back to the old rules.
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-08-01

is this true about homosexuals?
No offense to anyone but i just read this post from a user on YA in another section and wanted to make sure from you guys. Some statistics about the Homosexual lifestyle: One study reports 70% of homosexuals admitting to having sex only one time with over 50% of their partners 3 One study reports that the average homosexual has between 20 and 106 partners per year 6. The average heterosexual has 8 partners in a lifetime Many homosexual sexual encounters occur while drunk, high on drugs, or in an orgy setting 7 Many homosexuals dont pay heed to warnings of their lifestyles: "Knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behavior" 16 Homosexuals account for 3-4% of all gonorrhea cases, 60% of all syphilis cases, and 17% of all hospital admissions other than for STDs in the United States 5. They make up only 1-2% of the population Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis B, the "gay bowel syndrome" which attacks the intestinal tract, tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus 27 Of homosexuals questioned in one study reports that 43% admit to 500 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admit to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% say that half of those partners are total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts are one night stands or, as one homosexual admits in the film "The Castro", one minute stands 3. Also, it is a favorite past-time of many homosexuals to go to "cruisy areas" and have anonymous sex 78% of homosexuals are affected by STDs 20 50% of suicides can be attributed to homosexuals 10 It takes approximately $300,000 to take care of each AIDS victim, so thanks to the promiscuous lifestyle of homosexuals, medical insurance rates have been skyrocketing for all of us10 Homosexuals were responsible for spreading AIDS in the United States, and then raised up violent groups like Act Up and Ground Zero to complain about it. Even today, homosexuals account for well over 50% of the AIDS cases in the United States, which is quite a large number considering that they account for only 1-2% of the population Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne 8 37% of homosexuals engage in sadomasochism, which accounts for many accidental deaths. In San Francisco, classes were held to teach homosexuals how to not kill their partners during sadomasochism 8 41% of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms, 60% say they have had sex with strangers in bathhouses, and 64% of these encounters have involved the use of illegal drugs 8 Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries 8 Homosexuals prey on children. 33% of homosexuals ADMIT to minor/adult sex 7 There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association NAMBLA. This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is "SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE ITS TOO LATE." This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, assuming homosexuals make up 2% of the population, means that 1 in 20 homosexuals is a child molestor, while 1 in 490 heterosexuals is a child molestor 19 73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age 9 --- is this a true researches or fabricated ones? question for guys is it true that lubricants or anal sex between males causes anal cancer or something like that and that is why it is forbidden behavior in religions? thanks in advance. ........................ mm question is not showing up ........................

Answer: Total bullshit P&P :-
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-08-04

can you please enlighten me about this?
No offense to anyone but i just read this post from a user on YA in another section and wanted to make sure from you guys. Some statistics about the Homosexual lifestyle: One study reports 70% of homosexuals admitting to having sex only one time with over 50% of their partners 3 One study reports that the average homosexual has between 20 and 106 partners per year 6. The average heterosexual has 8 partners in a lifetime Many homosexual sexual encounters occur while drunk, high on drugs, or in an orgy setting 7 Many homosexuals dont pay heed to warnings of their lifestyles: "Knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behavior" 16 Homosexuals account for 3-4% of all gonorrhea cases, 60% of all syphilis cases, and 17% of all hospital admissions other than for STDs in the United States 5. They make up only 1-2% of the population Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis B, the "gay bowel syndrome" which attacks the intestinal tract, tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus 27 Of homosexuals questioned in one study reports that 43% admit to 500 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admit to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% say that half of those partners are total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts are one night stands or, as one homosexual admits in the film "The Castro", one minute stands 3. Also, it is a favorite past-time of many homosexuals to go to "cruisy areas" and have anonymous sex 78% of homosexuals are affected by STDs 20 50% of suicides can be attributed to homosexuals 10 It takes approximately $300,000 to take care of each AIDS victim, so thanks to the promiscuous lifestyle of homosexuals, medical insurance rates have been skyrocketing for all of us10 Homosexuals were responsible for spreading AIDS in the United States, and then raised up violent groups like Act Up and Ground Zero to complain about it. Even today, homosexuals account for well over 50% of the AIDS cases in the United States, which is quite a large number considering that they account for only 1-2% of the population Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne 8 37% of homosexuals engage in sadomasochism, which accounts for many accidental deaths. In San Francisco, classes were held to teach homosexuals how to not kill their partners during sadomasochism 8 41% of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms, 60% say they have had sex with strangers in bathhouses, and 64% of these encounters have involved the use of illegal drugs 8 Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries 8 Homosexuals prey on children. 33% of homosexuals ADMIT to minor/adult sex 7 There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association NAMBLA. This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is "SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE ITS TOO LATE." This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, assuming homosexuals make up 2% of the population, means that 1 in 20 homosexuals is a child molestor, while 1 in 490 heterosexuals is a child molestor 19 73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age 9 --- is this a true researches or fabricated ones? Question for guys is it true that lubricants or anal sex between males causes anal cancer or something like that and that is why it is forbidden behavior in religions? thanks in advance. .............

Answer: Is any of it true? At best, there are a couple things that are stretched out from partial truths. Most of it seems to be completely biased, or flat out lies. I would look up the references for some of these, and look for the biases in the studies. For example, the stats about multiple partners and the number of encounters while drugged... how much you wanna bet the sample is biased by finding people at the bar to take the study or some other craziness like that. However, the one that says homosexuals prey on children is complete bigotry. It originates from some of the pedophile cases that involve an adult male abusing a male child. Obviously, there are some gays who are abusive, just as there are straight people who are abusive. However, I would never say all straights are pedophiles because one adult man raped a female child. Nor would I say the same of gays. The other part of the stat, 33% of all child molestations are by gays, plays on this too. They are counting adults who identify as straight as gay because they abused a same sex child. They may or may not be gay, and most dont identify as gay. I have absolutely no idea about the number, but to be accurate that should be worded that x amount of child molestations are committed by same sex offenders. Nambla is real, but so is the kkk. I dont think all white people are racist. I have no idea what their motto is. One says that most gays dont heed health warnings... I think that comes from the fact that some not all, most or even many, just some gays dont use condoms or dental dams, because they have been taught that is about preventing pregnancy, something they dont have to worry about. Sex education is so bad in our country that many dont see the point in using condoms if pregnancy isnt a concern, and that includes straight people, adults, and teens. And, just like people of all orientations, you think you can trust your partner. The one about worms is hilarious. Actually, nearly everyone has some sort of parasite living in them. That includes you. It DOES take a lot of money to care for an aids patient, but it is a mistake to think everyone got it from being promiscuis. There are other ways to have blood on blood contact. Homosexuals werent responsible for aids. You should study that time period and what happened. In reality, white straights are responsible for the epidemic because they choose not to care when it started showing up, because the only people seeking treatment were gays. hiv and aids went more or less untreated in the us for like 10 years because no one cared enough about gay people to figure out what was going on, or care that it could spread to other people. And finally, even if some of these are real.. compare them to the straight statistics. How many straight people have had one night stands that involve alcohol or drugs? How many straight people have been with quite a few partners? Even if gays commit 33% of child molestation, that leaves the other 66% to straights. The disease stats are incorrect, but even if they were, you only listed major areas that have crazy huge gay populations. If the citys population has far more gay people in it, then I would expect that gays would have higher stats for that city than non gays. What about country wide? I am sure you would see then that hep rates are equally distributed according to population rates.
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-08-05

Do liberals actually know the definition of Socialism?
Socialism is defined Merriam-Webster as: 1 Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. 2 a. A system of society or group living in which there is no private property. b. A system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state. 3 A stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. General Motors is a prime example of state run businesses, they still have yet to pay back the loan from the bailout, only the interest, and this was "too big to fail" run by the Unions, who support the Marxist in the White House.The United States owned 60.8 percent of the common stock of GM Socialistic Health Care "reform" is another example of the dismal failure of the Obama Marxist mentality. American International Group AIG takeover is another example of Obamas Socialistic agenda.The US government still owns almost 80 percent of AIG Obamas Teen Mentor was Frank Marshall Davis a known CPUSA member - "...through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA CPUSA. The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his poetry and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just Frank." Source: Cliff Kincaid, Accuracy in the Media "Kathryn Takara of the University of Hawaii, who wrote a dissertation on the life of Frank Marshall Davis, confirming Davis was a significant influence on Obama when the senator attended Punahou prep school in Hawaii from 1975 to 1979" Source: Jim Corsi, WorldNetDaily based on Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection Cliff Kincaid and Herbert Romerstein President Obama is a socialist, a wealth-redistributing wolf in Democrats clothing gnawing at Americas entrepreneurial spirit.

Answer: Liberals know, and that is why the voted for Obama. Liberals WANT the government to take care of everybody.
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-08-16

Why do some still believe obama has the best interest of America in mind?
obama does not support the interest of the United States. case 1: he stated that he would side with the minority group even if their interest is against the interest of the people of the United States case 2: he refused to do the simplest of acts during his campaign to even remotely show he had respect for our nation. He would not wear the pin, he couldnt even put his hand over his heart for the National Anthem. case 3: he attempted to turn the United States into a socialized police state. quick for government to take control of companies even signed a bill allowing the government to decide if it needs to take over other companies, suggested people should report people if they spoke out against his policies, tells the senate to rush through bills he wants health care, economic destruction bills, etc... when he told the people during his campaign he would make the bill public and WAIT 3 days before voting so everyone can know what is in it now they just tell us its in our best interest and we should sit down and be quite case 4: shows utter disrespect and at best complete lack of knowledge on body language to show while meeting foreign heads. giving the queen of England one of our closest and longest allies an IPOD with recordings of his speeches. Giving the Prime minister of England dvds you could pick up from walmart. bowing to foreign heads of states England, saudi, Japan, etc..., inviting the president of mexico to the senate on an honorary visit while obama and the rest of the TRAITORS in the senate applauded him as he supports and even tells his citizens to cross our border illegally. I can go on forever, but the point is obama does not respect our nation. therefor i do not respect obama notice how i will never capitalize his name Tim, there is no "uneducated opinion" listed above. every item listed is something that has specifically been mentioned in the news. turn the daily show off and real news on and you might actually hear about some of this.

Answer: I couldnt agree more, you have made the case well and those who are still blinded by his BS will eventually find out it his agenda is fulfilled. Hopefully it never will be, but it is too close for comfort right now. About the only card left is for the energy bill to return and get passed and for the economy to finally go into full cardiac arrest. If those two events become reality, we will be in much deeper trouble than anyone can imagine. I am fortunate, my run here is getting shorter and maybe will be lucky enough to be gone before he gets his agenda complete. My concern is for the young people just starting out in the real world away from the protection of their parents. How will they survive a Marxist regime?
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-08-15

My friend posted this as a note on facebook. Is this true about McCain/Palin or is she just being a hater?
If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you’re “exotic, different.” If you grow up in Alaska eating moose burgers, you’re a quintessential American story. If your name is Barack, you’re a radical, unpatriotic Muslim. If you name your kids Willow, Trig and Track, you’re a maverick. If you graduate from Harvard law School, you are unstable. If you attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you’re well grounded. If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate’s Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran’s Affairs committees, you don’t have any real leadership experience. If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you’re qualified to become the country’s second highest ranking executive. If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you’re not a real Christian. If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you’re a Christian. If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society. If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state’s school system, while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant , you’re very responsible. If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family’s values don’t represent America’s. If you’re husband is nicknamed “First Dude”, with at least one DWI conviction and no college education, who didn’t register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable. Okay, much clearer now, Sarah/McCain represent TRUE Americanism My friend who is a junior in college actually did write this. She is an african-american liberal. I am a conservative. I was just checking, calm down.

Answer: Your friend is an idiot
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-08-10

Pro-pals, tell us honestly, where did you hide the money you stole?
Dr. Ghania Malhis is the chairwoman of the board of trustees at the Economic Policy Research Institute in Ramallah. She is also a member of the Palestinian government. Hope there are no doubts she is not “ a Zionist” and that what she says about the so- called “Palestinian Arabs” is not “ a Zionist propaganda”? On March 25 she addressed the United Nation´s Seminar on Assistance to the Palestinian People. While the Western idiots were , with tears in their eyes, telling about how many more billions the West should give to the “poor Palestinians” in order “to alleviate their sufferings” and the Arab smarties, in Versacci ties and 1500- dollars –worth Celvin´s suits, were solemnly confirming how they suffer, Dr. Ghania Malhis put it clear: the Palestinian Arabs stole $12 billion dollars donated by various Western governments and funds and also noted that years of foreign aid and billions of dollars spent over the past decade have not even restored the PA economy to its 1999 performance. Malhis estimated that foreign countries had donated a total of $12 billion to the PA since 1995. That figure did not include billions of dollars in aid provided by international aid groups such as UNRWA and other NGOs, she noted. Aid to the PA is increasing steadily: the PA received an average of one billion dollars a year between 2001 and 2005, $1.5 billion in 2007, $1.8 billion in 2009, and an estimated $2 billion is expected in 2010. The total amount of Arabs who are currently occupying the Jewish Palestine is about 2,6 million, which means that each “poor Arab” gets almost a 1000 dollars only in cash, and another 1000 dollars worth in aid. And yet, Malhis said, it has been difficult to note any positive impact of these enormous sums on the PA economy. The GDP is 13 percent lower than it was in 1999, and GDP per capita is down by 30 percent, she said. Two main contributing factors are the large PA public payroll, which accounts for almost 60 percent of the PAs spending, and the money poured into the armed forces, which is more than the combined amounts spent on health and education, Malhis said. Malhis elaborated: 1. The production capacity in the occupied territories was higher in the early nineties prior to the peace process, 2. The ratio of exports to imports became a feeble 19 percent 3. The ability of Domestic Production to cover domestic national consumption deteriorated resulting in an increase in dependency on Israeli imports and a heavy reliance on Arab and international aid to finance the cost of these imports. 4. We have also witnessed deterioration in PA ability to provide basic services such as health, education, social development and security unless heavily subsidized by Arab and international donations and aid to support its expenditures. 5. In 2009, international support was required to address a budget deficit of 61.4 percent, equivalent to 39 percent of the Palestinian GDP." She concluded: "One cannot but feel that these resources have been wasted. When the outcome of more than a 12 billion dollar investment results in such disastrous numbers, then it is obvious that immense mistakes were made on a strategic level". She named the following causes: “The Palestinians, and in specific the Palestinian Authority, hold a sizeable responsibility, having failed to invest the funds mobilized by Arab and International donors on development and instead using them to cover their current running expenditures”. Putting it clear, the Arab leaders stole the money. On what? Kawther Salaam, who reported the summary on the Palestine Think Tank site, wrote:"It was also exposed in the English and Arab media that Al Al, brother of an assistant to Mahmoud Abbas, "bought" land from a dead person near the Jordan River in an Israeli military area. The land does not exist, but a total of $2,700,000 was paid by the PA from an account at the Bank of Jordan as a price of the land; [and] $750.000 of this sum was reportedly paid as fees to the Bank of Jordan itself, what hints at the involvement of this Bank in the embezzlement of funds donated by the international community towards support for the Palestinian people." The report, in the independent Kafiyeh network, claims that Hamas Gaza kingpin Ismail Haniyeh has bought property worth $4 million in Gaza and apparently intends to build there. The purchase is reportedly registered in the name of one of his sons. Haniyeh has reportedly purchased real estate for his family members as well, including an apartment for his wife. And so on, the list of examples of how Arabs steal money the West gives them is simply endless. Mahlis did not detail corruption, saying only: "The Palestinian Authority has also failed to timely address allegations of misuse of funds, power and mismanagement as well as a lack of accountability and transparency." Past exposures showed that senior PA officials, inc

Answer: Swiss bank accounts when it was possible, now they hide it in Kazakhstan and some other countries which have banking accounts with no names, only numbers...
Category: United Health Group; Date: 2010-07-21




All Categories

Addictions
Alternative Health
Animal Health
Beauty
Child Health
Dentistry
Environmental Health
Fitness
Health Issues
Mental Health

Popular Categories

Apitherapy
Fasting and Cleansing
Meditation
Reiki
Mental Grief, Loss
Perfumes and Scents
Child Abuse
Dental Conditions
Orthodontics
Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
Pilates Method
Family Planning

Major Categories

Arts
Business
Finance
Health
Travel
Society
 RECOMMENDED: Brands    Derm Store   NY Times Store   My Jewelry Box   Cardstore